Bipolaridad electoral colombiana..JR

Mucha bipolaridad politica causo esta compleja campaña, que finalizo con tres candidatos a elegir y de ser viable en una segunda vuelta, incluir al candidato de la discordia electoral.

En las últimas tres semanas se decidió la tendencia de voto y es ahora después de las elecciones,  de quien negocia con quien para después de crear coaliciones aún desconocidas capturar el voto bipolar.

Aureliano alias Gustavo Petro, populista y arrogante ademas de populista y endulzador  de oídos, con promesas de quitar de dar sus oportunidades de coalición son escasas y el solo espera incrementar el odio a Uribe para el recibir la votación bipolar que acusa al régimen narcofarquista de Maduro, pero esta con el. Fajardo no le va endosar su electorado ya que el mismo no sabe como lo obtuvo en esa cantidad.  Ese elector voto por Fajardo por Temor de Petro y por odio a Uribe, lo cual puede jugar mas a favor de Duque en su voto final. La arrogancia típica de indultado genocida y narcofarquista, mas su prepotencia triunfalista ante la justicia y la ley con su corte chavista le dan con el aval de las NarcoFarc y Piedad Córdoba algunos puntos que sumarán al momento de votar. Su paso por la alcaldía de Bogotá lo delató cómo pesimo administrador y ejecutor, solo dejando su campaña Bogotá Humana como accion social de su mandato. Es un candidato que no genera confianza por su discurso del rencor y resentimiento social que lo identifica con Castro y hoy Maduro herederos de Chávez.  Esperará recibir los electores de Humberto de la Calle por su amistad y gestión en el acto de paz que Santos convocó. Se le complica el discurso de su paz con la detención de Santrich y su pedido de extracción qué de la Calle defiende no permitirlo a todo timbal. La nación se la cobro a dela Calle alumno de Santos.
Y los votos de Germán Vargas a quien van? Estos electores si estan en la tendencia Duque mas que Aureliano alias Petro. Las bancadas y los caciques electorales de Vargas no le van a Petro jamás.  Que pedirá a cambio Vargas a Duque por su endosó?
La rueda esta en los endoso de Fajardo y Vargas a donde se decidirán votar.
Google Fajardo méritorio alcance logro y como profesor ahora sabe que es perder por in decimal. Su silencio puede otorgar al elector poder definir su voto a Duque en gran proporción.
Y que espera  Iván Duque al buscar acuerdos con Morales que de seguro tendrá la cartera de justicia y porque no ofrecerle a Fajardo la de educación? Ventaja obtuvo no suficiente para no  ir a segunda vuelta Duque y se salvó que Fajardo por tan poca diferencia no lograra ser la segunda opcion presidencial, lo cual hubiera sido para Colombia una gran contienda electoral.
Unas semanas mas de radio y televisión, prensa y debates han de atiburrir los medios de comunicación y redes sociales, donde el electorado definara una Colombia democrática y  bajo ley y orden o se entrega al foro dd Sao Paulo y su pactó Habana NarcoFarc, pero igual presidente habra el 17 de Junio.

Asi es la bipolaridad electoral de una nacion folclórica y del sagrado corazón.

José Rodrigo Umaña JR
Blanco o Negro
Mascaras de la verdad

A proposed federal effort to map the human brain has drawn both applause and dismay over its ambitious scope and potential costs JR Topics

Researchers debate wisdom of brain-mapping initiative

Is a federal brain-mapping project just pie in the sky?

The White House will soon unveil a major initiative that would map human brain cell activity. The effort, led by the National Institutes of Health, could be on the scale of the war on cancer in the 1970s or the Human Genome Project of the '90s, which mapped the human genetic blueprint.

"This is not a project yet, it is more like an idea," says Story Landis, director of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. "The brain is the last great frontier. It's what makes us human, how we think, how we write poetry. And the burden of disease that affects the brain is pretty extraordinary."

Yet the proposal has triggered disagreement among neuroscientists over whether such an effort is warranted or whether it threatens other, more vital research. The debate comes amid intense competition for federal research grants among bio-medical researchers, who have seen the National Institutes of Health's $31 billion budget stay flat in recent years after a period of doubling in the past decade.

"We are right on the edge of finding out really vital information about the brain," says Brown University neuroscientist John Donoghue, who was part of the project team. "There are questions we can now answer that can only be tackled as a collaborative project," not by individual labs.

But other researchers such as Leslie Vosshall of Rockefeller University in New York have criticized the ambition and potential cost.

"We don't understand the fly brain yet. How will this come to anything?" Vosshall asked in a Twitter response Monday to word of the proposed project in The New York Times. If the projected $300 million annual cost (in the neighborhood of the federal Human Genome Project in the late 1990s) is taken from NIH's flat budget, she estimates, 750 lab chiefs would lose grants in universities across the USA.

The human brain contains about 86 billion brain cells, or neurons, which work together in networks to trigger our thoughts, feelings and actions. Similar to the Human Genome Project, the "Brain Activity Map" effort would be coordinated at labs to first build brain imaging tools and then uncover the networks at the level of thousands to millions of cells. One goal would be to use new tools that allow scientists to see how recruitment of brain cells in networks is tied to both physical and mental ailments, Donoghue says.

"Just like astronomy, where we don't have to see every star to understand how stars work but seeing many helps us understand them, we won't have to see every brain cell in a network to understand what is going on," he says.

Landis says that "to my knowledge, no funding has been set aside yet," and planning for grant proposals also await development. NIH referred requests for comments on the cost of the project, proposed for a March rollout, to the White House Office of Science and Technology, which declined a request for financial details.

The news comes ahead of President Obama's proposed 2014 budget and as politicians are fighting over federal budget cuts amid a still-struggling economy. Donoghue says he hopes the project would represent "new money," rather than cuts to the NIH budget.

"The devil is in the details. It always is," neuroscientist Cori Bargmann says by e-mail. "The project needs to make sense to those who care deeply about neurological disease and neuroscience."

Nikon Coolpix L810 16MP 26X Optical Zoom Black Digital Camera (Google Affiliate Ad)